Trump Condemns British Imperial Ideology at Davos 2020.

View and Download a print / PDF version here

Part 1—The British Empire is America’s Historic Enemy

Part 3—The British Kill Abraham Lincoln

Part 4—The British Kill William McKinley

Part 5—The British Kill John F. Kennedy


Part 2—The British Threat to Donald Trump

Official Washington, D.C. is awash now with panicked talk of assassinating Donald Trump.  The immediate trigger was Robert Kagan’s signal piece in the Washington Post of November 30th.  Called out publicly for advocating a hit by sentient readers or viewers of its accompanying bloody images of Trump and Julius Caesar, Kagan attempted a retreat, publishing two subsequent pieces in the Post claiming that the first article didn’t say what it said.  But The Atlantic, another central player in the war on Trump, had devoted its entire January/February 2024 issue to 24 horror stories about how the world will end if Trump wins a second term, demonstrating a coordinated mobilization and intention.

In his November 30th screed, Kagan argued that all the attacks on Trump have failed and will fail.  His clear target audience was his fellow criminal conspirators in the now 8-year vendetta against Donald Trump. Stoking the central narrative used throughout their campaign, Kagan painted Trump as an emergent decisive Hitler, now fully supported by the American people.  Kagen rants that American elites have proved themselves worse cowards than Weimar’s Social Democrats.  They could have acted decisively within quasi-legal boundaries but now must ponder something beyond those bounds.  Trump will almost certainly pursue those who have attacked him once President again.  In that case, “Will those who balked at resisting Trump when the risk was merely political oblivion suddenly discover their courage when the cost might be the ruin of oneself and one’s family?”

Kagan, of course, is the dean of Washington’s foreign policy elite, the co-author of the Project for a New American Century manifesto which sent the United States into decades of imperial “small wars” on behalf of “democracy,” killing and displacing millions and crapping all over our hard-earned heritage and honor. He is the husband of the neo-Nazi den mother of Kiev, Ukraine, and current third ranking official in the U.S. State Department, Victoria Nuland.

Lyndon LaRouche once located the reason why the minions of the modern British Empire are driven to kill or imprison their opponents as a kind of species behavioral instinct.  They recognize those with creative minds and an unflinching dedication to the truth as their eternal enemies; they survive only to the extent that they can control.  That control, in turn, depends on subjects acting as predictable subjects. LaRouche also said that the oligarchy does not choose its targets because of what they have done; but for what they could or would do in the future.

Robert Kagan, Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlantic’s editor, and every other criminal stoking the Trump assassination memes must be called out publicly, by name, each time they write their incitements or speak them. Stop impotently wringing your hands. Ask them: Are you an assassin out to destroy our nation?  Name the names and tell them they will be held responsible if anything happens to Trump.  But if you are looking to protect Donald Trump by focusing on the Robert Kagans or Jeff Goldbergs of this world, the professional retainers of the modern British Empire, you are blinding yourself to the heart of the conspiracy.  The Empire itself must have its feet held to the fire.

This Empire is located on that imperial strip of land located in London, England and known since ancient times as the City of London Corporation.  It is located in the world’s central banking apparatus and its offshore havens for which the City and Wall Street are capitals.  It is located in the various multinational corporations, creations of the British and Dutch Royals, such as the World Economic Forum and the assorted foundations, think tanks, law firms, and representatives of official intelligence agencies and governments who are on the payroll.  Donald Trump has simplified this by calling this grouping the “globalists.”

This author’s article “A British Intelligence Fraud Creates the Coup Against Donald Trump” and other reports, such as “John Durham Ignores Role of U.S., U.K., Australian and Israeli Intelligence Operatives in Setting the Stages for Crossfire Hurricane,” have provided extensive documentation, showing that from the time Donald Trump walked down the escalator at Trump Tower in 2015 he became the target of this entity. As the London Guardian gloated in an April, 2017 article, “British spies were first to spot Trump team’s links with Russia,” “GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious ‘interactions’ between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents. . .. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information.”  Thus, the Trump/Russia hoax was born.  Obama CIA Director John Brennan described the passing of this intelligence as more of a demand for action with heads of British intelligence themselves showing up at his door with envelopes.

The subsequent GCHQ and CIA surveillance identified Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Michael Flynn, and Paul Manafort as targets for entrapment operations conducted for the most part on British soil by British operatives.  It isn’t happenstance that these four became the targets, by July of 2016, for the FBI’s fake Crossfire Hurricane investigation of the Trump Campaign.

Christopher Steele, the former head of MI6’s Russia Desk, fabricated the dirty dossier used to frame the full spectrum information warfare which painted Donald Trump as a Russian dupe.  Among the specializations which have been, at one point or another, listed as special skills of Steele’s Orbis Business Intelligence are, “creating public opinion groundswells,” and “delivering targeted political campaigns.”  Steele himself was mentored by Sir Richard Dearlove, the dean of a very dirty British intelligence circle which includes the Henry Jackson Society and the intelligence firm Hakluyt, along with official British government intelligence agencies.  Hakluyt is a retirement firm for British spooks named after the geographer and retainer of the British East India Company Richard Hakluyt, known for his work promoting the colonization of America by the British.  Richard Dearlove is an old hand at such operations.  While leading MI6, Dearlove infamously vouched for the doctored dossier which said that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, collaborating with the CIA’s George Tenet on one of the most deadly intelligence lies in the last century.

This is not to say that the Obama White House was not a witting coconspirator in these operations.  They were in it with both feet.  But our insistence is that, as usual, the inspiration and the idea were British, and, as they had since Franklin Roosevelt died, sympathetic and profiled Tories in Washington accommodated them.  Trump, it was said, was out to completely destroy Barack Obama’s very British foreign policy “legacy” and, as outlined below, the entire British “rules based” international order you hear our village idiot Joe Biden blathering about every day.

After it became clear that the initial phase of the coup against Trump had failed, the British House of Lords Select Committee on International Policy made a June 2018 tour of official Washington and then issued a report, in December of 2018, “UK Foreign Policy in a Shifting World Order.” which centered on the issue (in diplo-speak) of ensuring that Donald Trump did not get a second term.  In discussions surrounding the report, Sir Richard Dearlove insisted that Trump would be a one term president. In addition to Trump and the United States the three other nations targeted for maximum British treatment were Russia, China, and India.

If you are familiar with Lyndon LaRouche’s plans for a new fixed exchange monetary system and an agreement among these four powers for developing the world—destroying the British imperium in the process—that targeting is remarkable.  As usual, the British planned to keep their four targets at each other’s throats.  Trump, of course, denounced those who sought to cabin his dealings with these four nations. 

Here are some direct quotations from the House of Lords report. Note its startling portrayal of British imperial control of Washington:

“The U.S. Administration has taken a number of high-profile unilateral foreign policy decisions that are contrary to the interests of the United Kingdom. In particular, US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change, the Iran nuclear deal and the UN Human Rights Council, and the imposition of trade tariffs on its allies, undermine efforts to tackle pressing global challenges of critical importance to the UK . . .

“Below the political level, the UK and U.S. are deeply entwined through defence and intelligence links, and connections between officials, which should withstand political decisions by the Administration. The Government should reach out to those parts of American society which share our views and values. . .

“However, the difficulty the UK and its allies have faced in trying to influence the U.S. demonstrates the challenge of working with the Administration.  How damaging this will be to what has hitherto been the UK’s most important international relationship will depend on whether the current approach is an enduring trend.  Should President Trump win a second term, or a similar Administration succeed him, the damage to UK–US relations will be longer lasting; and the Government will need to place less reliance on reaching a common US/UK approach to the main issues of the day than has often been the case in the past.

“The Government’s response to US foreign policy decisions needs now more than ever to be closely coordinated with like-minded countries throughout the world.”

Reduced to plain English, the Lords directly attack the central policies of the Trump Administration, claim that the defense and intelligence communities of the U.S. have joined them, and announce that they are lining up international allies for this campaign. They say here and elsewhere that they can contain Trump for one term but not two.

During their Washington tour, the Lords found that both Houses of Congress were deeply committed to the “special relationship” with the UK and “the rules based international order.”  They concluded that intelligence and defense relationships were such that they would continue as “normal” regardless of any attempts at presidential interference.  But the Lords also worried during their proceedings with the Atlantic Council that Trump, having survived the initial assault against him by 2018, would now become exceedingly difficult to contain.  Over and over in the report they lament Trump’s “unpredictability” as the cause of catastrophic international “instability.”

In a separate paragraph within the report itself, James Rogers, Director of the Global Britain program for the Henry Jackson Society described the “rules based international order” which Trump was “disrupting” as follows:  

1) “politically, it is comprised of liberal–democratic nation-states;”

2) “economically, it involves globalization, whereby the world is progressively linked together in a more integrated economic system;

3) “diplomatically, it is founded on expectations of peaceful change, where its members structure their relations through a plethora of international laws and organizations . . . It is “an attempt by a community of like-minded democratic states to ‘domesticate’ the international system in such a way that it becomes more like an international society, based on a clear set of rules, to try and prevent revisionist behavior, particularly when confronted by authoritarian states that seek to revise the rules or challenge the liberal assumptions on which it is based.”.

Unsaid of course, is the fact that those nation states asserting their sovereignty, such as Russia or Donald Trump’s United States, will be deemed “authoritarian” and “revisionist” by this very same rules-based order and subject thereby to the penalties of financial sanctions, hybrid warfare including political murders, and outright war.

The rest of the House of Lords Report centered on creating a surveillance and censorship regime designed to prevent ordinary citizens from succumbing to “conspiracy” theories about the murderous doings of their elite masters. Brexit, and Trump’s election were not the result of the 2007-2008 financial collapse and bailout of the international bankers, which devastated the US and UK middle and working classes, the Lords insist.  Instead. these electoral catastrophes flowed from conspiracy theories adopted by the masses denying their masters’ legitimacy.  The conspiracy theories flow when the public has “too much access’ to information.  At the time of the Report, a British military propaganda front, known as the Integrity Initiative had just been exposed running operations in Britain and the United States through controlled “clusters” of journalists, most of whom had been and are involved in the operations against Trump. You can read about that in the LaRouche PAC posting “The Integrity Initiative's Foreign Agents of Influence Invade the United States.”

On January 21, 2020, Donald Trump intervened at the Davos conference of the World Economic Forum.  In his speech. He challenged all the axioms of the present world elite. He detailed his design for an economy based on what is best for the worker, a blue-collar renaissance.  He touted an international order based on reciprocal fair dealing between sovereign nation states rather than world government. Finally, he said this:

“This is not a time for pessimism; this is a time for optimism.  Fear and doubt is not a good thought process because this is a time for tremendous hope and joy and optimism and action.        

“But to embrace the possibilities of tomorrow, we must reject the perennial prophets of doom and their predictions of the apocalypse.  They are the heirs of yesterday’s foolish fortune-tellers — and I have them and you have them, and we all have them, and they want to see us do badly, but we don’t let that happen.  They predicted an overpopulation crisis in the 1960s, mass starvation in the ’70s, and an end of oil in the 1990s.  These alarmists always demand the same thing: absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of our lives. . .

“Anyone who doubts what is possible in the future, we need only look at the towering achievements of the past.  Only a few hundred miles from here are some of the great cities of Europe — teeming centers of commerce and culture.  Each of them is full of reminders of what human drive and imagination can achieve.

“Centuries ago, at the time of the Renaissance, skilled craftsmen and laborers looked upwards and built the structures that still touch the human heart.  To this day, some of the greatest structures in the world have been built hundreds of years ago.

“In Italy, the citizens once started construction on what would be a 140-year project, the Duomo of Florence.  An incredible, incredible place.  While the technology did not yet exist to complete their design, city fathers forged ahead anyway, certain that they would figure it out someday.  These citizens of Florence did not accept limits to their high aspirations and so the Great Dome was finally built.”

If it hadn’t been before, the die was cast right then and there.

Recent responses