Act Against War Danger: Expose the Truth on Robert Mueller's Core Lie, that Russia Hacked the DNC
An international breakdown potential is now active, which has the world on the verge of world war, because of the perpetration of Russia-gate, based on complete fraud. Understanding that this British-pedigree subversion operation is based on the specific fabrication that Russia hacked into the Democratic National Committee in 2016, is critical to end the subversion, and terminate the entire geopolitical era. This week, LaRouchePAC has re-posted a critical piece of ammunition, the Feb. 13 article by two cyber experts, titled, "Why the DNC Was Not Hacked by the Russians." The authors are technical experts in data handling: Bill Binney, former Technical Director for the National Security Agency, and Larry Johnson, formerly of the CIA.
The Feb. 26 LPAC posting, titled, "Bill Binney and Larry Johnson Shred Robert Mueller's Russian Hack Fable," has an introduction by Barbara Boyd, saying, "Please read and circulate this article and demand its publication in your local newspaper and on social media. If properly followed up, it can upend the coup and send to jail those responsible for attempting to overthrow the legitimate government of the United States, the one the voters elected in 2016. And this is a matter of war and peace, because the Russian hack false narrative is a central element in fomenting a new and very dangerous Cold War between the United States and Russia. This article must achieve the widest circulation possible prior to Mueller delivering his fictional report." The FBI/Robert Mueller report is now said to likely be out next week.
Schiller Institute President Helga Zepp-LaRouche yesterday addressed the war danger, by recounting the view of a fellow participant in a Schiller seminar in Berlin. Zepp- LaRouche's own presentation at the event was titled, "Strategic Showdown or a New Paradigm." The participant told Zepp LaRouche that, he does not expect the U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty will result in immediate placement of U.S. missiles in Europe, but "it opens a Pandora's box" of instabilities and dangers. He listed many, including that old structures are dissolving, and governments are not putting into place a new system. The U.S. withdrawal can catalyze an uncontrolled armament and conflict situation short-term. It sends a "psychological signal" for action in that direction.
To get out of this dangerous dynamic, our unique role is to present the New Paradigm mode of thinking, as expressed in the New Bretton Woods orientation. This is based on viewing civilization from the vantage point of the future. There is no solution to any problem or conflict by viewing things in terms of present-day Aristotelian contradiction. That means there is no solution to crises in the contrived geometry in which they might appear, whether concerning North Korea, for example, or Venezuela, or Yemen, or Afghanistan. Solutions have to take into account the interests of all involved. That is how to judge true security measures.
Helga Zepp LaRouche laid this out five years ago in her introduction to the EIR Special Report, "The New Silk Road Becomes The World Land-Bridge." She wrote about ascending to a higher level, for "a new model of cooperation among the nations of the world." She presented "Cusa's idea of unity in multiplicity, and it must be inspired by a tender love for the idea of the community of nations, for the idea of mankind as the creative species."
By that measure, look at the shocking spectacle yesterday of the breakdown in culture shown by Michael Cohen's sleazeball testimony at the Capitol Hill hearing. Plus, the Congressional sleaze and media sleaze as well. This was Grade C mafia movie stuff. There should be the greatest outrage.
Again, solutions don't exist in the current geometry, but in acting from the future, and serving the common interests of mankind as a whole. Zepp-LaRouche quoted Albert Einstein, "there is never a solution on the level on which the problem arises; always look to a higher level."