Lord Monckton: Why is Gore Scared to Debate Him?

UPDATE: EIR is investigating why (and which) powerful forces throughout Europe, behind such media organs as Germany's Bildzeitung and Frankfurther Allgemeine Zeitung, Britain's Channel 4, and numerous publications in Denmark, are so powerfully attacking Gore and his climate change hoax. More will be forthcoming as the investigation progresses.

For a second time, Lord Monckton of Brenchley has challenged sophist Gore to a debate on man-made climate change, in an ad featured in the April 3rd Washington Post. Moncton's first challenge was issued March 14th of this year, but was left unanswered by the self-proclaimed "Goracle". The ad will soon be featured in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal as well.

In November 2006, Lord Monckton issued a 40-page research paper on the fraud of global warming, titled "Apocalypse Cancelled". In it, Monckton says: "Last week Gordon Brown and his chief economist both said global warming was the worst market failure ever. That loaded sound-bite suggests the climate change scare is less about saving the planet than, in Jacques Chirac's chilling phrase, creating world government."

Lord Monckton also said that the environmentalist's "precautionary principle" is killing people. He gives the example of the banning of DDT, noting that just this year, after 30 million people died of malaria; the World Health Organization has agreed to use DDT for indoor spraying. Lord Monckton also calls for the UK to start building--not merely designing, or having a ten-year planning inquiry about) 12 nuclear power stations.

In 2005, the House of Lords started an inquiry into the science of global warming and the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and held hearings taking statements from scientists against global warming, like Dr. Paul Reiter and Richard Lindzen of MIT. The House of Lords also took testimony from Sir John Houghton.

In July of 2005, the House of Lords issued its report, called "The Economics of Climate Change". News of this report, however, was overshadowed by the July 7 London subway bombings. The report was to be released and covered by in the media prior to the Gleneagles Scotland G-8 meeting, and was to influence the debate of the G-8. Of particular note in the House of Lords report is that it called for the IPCC to be shut down because it was a vehicle for a set policy without looking at the science, didn't listen to dissenting voices, and its process for selecting scientists for the panel was politically driven. It is of note that the House of Lords report is not mentioned by the IPCC or the Stern Review.

In August 2005, in response to the House of Lords Report, Gordon Brown went to his chief economist, Sir Nick Stern (who was the Chief Economist of the World Bank from 2000-2003), and told him to produce a report on the economic effects of climate change.

In October 2006, the Stern Review was released to much media hype and fanfare, but the report got little attention until the IPCC released their Summary for Policymakers in February.

There is only one reason why Gore will not answer Monckton: because he knows global warming is a massive swindle!

For too long the media has been dominated by the lies of the environmentalist lobby. Now science and truth are fighting back.