Ahora que se voltea el gusano: mejor revisa el ADN del "abrazo de Grasso"

January 5, 2008 (LPAC)--As the FARC hostage release farce played itself out over year end, a soap-opera sub-plot was featured widely in the international media, around DNA testing to establish whether, in fact, a young child living in a Bogota foster home was Emmanuel, the boy born in captivity to hostage Clara Rojas, purportedly fathered by a FARC guerrilla. The case of the child got so much play that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez had named the release farce, "Operation Emmanuel."

When the FARC called off the release on Dec. 31, huffing about supposed military maneuvers, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe suggested the FARC might have canned the operation, because Emmanuel was no longer in their hands. A man claiming to have brought the hostage boy to a hospital two years before, had come to authorities seeking protection, because the FARC had ordered him to bring the boy back to them by Dec. 30, or be killed.

Lo and behold, after DNA testing of the foster child showed he could well be Clara Rojas's son, Emmanuel, the FARC issued a communique admitting they no longer held the boy who was to be the poster child for the grand release, but, with the chutzpah typical of this cocaine cartel so beloved of British support, they charged that the Uribe government had "kidnapped" the boy, to screw up the hostage release!

Before this saga gets even more kinky, LPAC has a better idea: DNA testing is required, but it should be done on FARC top commander Raul Reyes and Richard Grasso, then head of the New York Stock exchange, whose infamous "Grasso Abrazo"--their June 1999 embrace in the steamy jungles of Colombia--engendered the strategic alliance between the FARC cartel and British-directed Wall Street financial interests, and alliance which the British are now deploying in order to sink the region into conflagration.